趣圖共賞 Ming-Qing Illustrations of Weiqi


Update on June 19, 2012:
Xuetui-sensei in the comments section alerted me to these excellent blog posts by Dr. Andrew West on images of weiqi. The second post in particular does exactly what I had wanted to do in the future, but alas, it turns out that someone has already produced some really good work!
A Pictorial History of the Game of Go
Playing Go on a Chinese Chess Board



I have an amateurish interest in collecting historical illustrations of the board game weiqi 围棋, with the hope that these visual sources can someday supplement the more obvious genres such as game records (qipu 棋譜) in reconstructing how the game was actually played in late imperial China. I was fortunate to find three such illustrations during my recent museum visits in China, although these images turned out to be interesting in ways that I had not originally expected.

The first image comes from a set of four Ming hanging scrolls, each of which depicts one of the four arts of the literati: zither, chess, calligraphy, and painting (琴棋書畫). Belonging squarely to the genre of literati painting, its depiction of the game best fits my original expectation of what a representation of weiqi should look like.

十八學士圖屏
Source: (明) 杜堇 十八學士圖屏 上海博物館

The second image comes from a blue-and-white porcelain jar of the Ming dynasty. Portrayed around its sides are the images of two women engaged in the same four arts. What interests me here is the rather inaccurate depiction of weiqi. If you look carefully, the board only has black stones but no white ones. Also, the size of the board is 14×7, whereas the standard size of a weiqi board is 19×19.*

青花琴棋書畫圖罐
Source: 明宣德期 景德鎮窰青花琴棋書畫圖罐 上海博物館

The third image comes from a Qing porcelain vase, also showing two women playing the game. This time we see both black and white stones on the board, but anyone who has played weiqi will see that the placement of the black stones make no sense at all. Also, the size of the board is 15×13, again a rather strange shape.

粉彩燈籠罇
Source: 清雍正期 粉彩燈籠罇 蘇州博物館

What are we to make of these last two images? Assuming that these women are not playing a totally different game, I think there are two possibilities. The first is that whoever illustrated the porcelain did not care about providing precise representations of what they were depicting. This seems to be the case of the second image, where the lack of white stones might be explained by the difficulty of depicting these stones when the only colors available were blue and white. Here, what mattered was that the viewers recognize that the women are playing chess, not to provide precise depictions of the details. The second possibility is that the illustrator did try to represent some details but had limited knowledge of what the game was about. This seems to be the case of the third image, where the illustrator did give a semblance of a weiqi board, but the particular placement of the stones suggests that he or she did not know the rules of the game very well.

Clearly, this kind of illustrations cannot serve my original purpose of reconstructing actual gameplay, but they lead to other interesting directions in thinking about who the illustrators were, who were the presumed consumers of the porcelain, and how a fundamentally elite game was perceived and represented among elites and non-elite alike. I’m not sure if I will ever be able to write something up with these weiqi illustrations, but for now, I plan to just keep collecting and indexing them. So if anyone comes across illustrations related to weiqi, please send me a quick reference. I appreciate references to items from any time and place, and I particularly like images that are not so famous and/or are on media other than paper.


Note:
*Although there were weiqi boards of different sizes, I believe the 19×19 board was fairly standard by Ming-Qing times, and boards that have different numbers of lines on each side are definitely unheard of.
Correction on June 19, 2012: The blog post by Andrew West discusses a curious 9×12 board.

Leave a comment

6 Comments

  1. Mårten Söderblom Saarela

     /  2012/06/17

    I don’t have anything on visual representations of weiqi in particular, but your post made me think of my former teacher at SOAS, Andrew Lo, who has published a lot on games, including this on weiqi:

    Lo, Andrew (盧慶濱) (2010) ‘《唐宋圍棋詩歌的雅與俗》(The Elegant and the Common in Poems on the Game of Weiqi in Tang and Song Dynasty Poetry).’ In: 雅俗相成—傳統文化質性的變易 (The Complementarity of the Elegant and the Common – Qualitative Changes in Traditional Culture). Taiwan: Zhongyang Daxue Chuban Zhongxin; Airti Press, pp. 215-259.

    http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/13464/

    Reply
  2. Hi Marten,
    Thanks so much for the reference! This article looks very interesting and I’ll definitely check it out. Please let me know if you come across any other interesting works/sources, visual or otherwise.

    Reply
  3. 王さん

    いつも興味深く拝見しております。たまたま、同じく、囲碁の図像を紹介したサイトを見ましたが、もちろん王さんの紹介なさった図像3点は、未紹介です。

    “A Pictorial History of the Game of Go”
    http://babelstone.blogspot.de/2009/04/pictorial-history-of-game-of-go.html

    もちろん、ご存知のサイトであろうと思いますが、蛇足ながら。

    学退上

    Reply
  4. 学退先生

    とても興味深いサイトを紹介してくださり、本当にありがとうございます。お恥ずかしながら、この記事もサイトも全く知りませんでした。囲碁画像の収集は最近趣味で始めたので先行研究もほとんど見ていなく、既に出版されているものを見落としても不思議ではないのですが、まさか同じブログという媒体でほぼ同じことをやっている方がいたとは考えてもいませんでした。

    特にもう一つの記事の象棋盤を囲碁盤として使った画像の紹介は、盤面の復元など私が将来やりたいと思っていたことを丁寧にしてあり、とても素晴らしい内容です。しかも考古資料の使い方といい、盤面復元の際に見られる囲碁そのもののセンスといい、私がこれから何年博物館を回ってもとても追いつけない内容です。とりあえず、これからも囲碁画像は集める続けるつもりですが、明清磁器に見られるおかしな碁盤、などといった方向に特化する可能性が大きいです。

    あらためて、情報の提供どうもありがとうございました。向こうの記事へのリンクをトップに付け加えておきます。

    Reply
  5. Hi Chelsea, I am glad that you found my blog posts interesting; I love your photos of the vases! By a curious coincidence Andrew Lo was also my teacher and mentor at SOAS, although I can’t remember ever discussing weiqi with him.

    Reply
    • Dear Dr. West,

      Thanks very much for your kind comments! I was actually just planning to write to you. I really enjoyed reading your posts, and was deeply struck by how much can potentially be done using archeological sources. I’m quite clueless as to where even to look these sources up, so it was very helpful looking at the kind of publications that were cited in your post.

      It looks like the scope of your image collection ends roughly around the Yuan dynasty, but if I ever manage to gather a sizable collection of Ming-Qing images, I will make sure to send you an update.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: